Whether you’re an egalitarian or a complementarian, I wish all people approached the subject as Darrin Patrick does:
1. Darrin is sincere in his belief, but he allows for others to differ.
2. Darrin came to his conclusion by studying scripture, not by talking with someone who read someone else’s book.
3. Darrin doesn’t use this issue as a test for sincerity or fellowship. He agreeably disagrees.
So, no matter which side of this argument you come down on, I appreciate, in the end, how he has communicated his differences.
What do you think?