It doesn't get theologically geekier than this, folks…

According to Denny Burk, there’s a new kerfuffle over theology:

Pete Enns critiques John Piper’s recent remarks about the Jewish conquest of Canaan in the Old Testament. Piper argues that God’s judgments are just and shouldn’t be questioned. Enns objects and argues that the biblical accounts are historically inaccurate and at odds with Jesus’ ethic in the New Testament.

OK, I’m sure that this is important for some reason.

Burk talks about Biblical inerrancy, historical inaccuracies, archeological data, God’ sovereignty, and authority of scriptures.

According to Burk:

If your view of scripture is deficient, then it’s no surprise that your view of God’s sovereignty might be deficient as well. Enns falls short on both counts.

Ouch.

The current score:

Piper 2, Enns 1.

But my guess is the ‘this is silly’ or ‘wow, you’re deep and way to serious’ crowd will come back for the win.

Todd

10 Comments

    • Todd Rhoades
  1. Bob
  2. Barchetta
    • Todd Rhoades
  3. Barchetta
  4. Joe
  5. Jack

Add Comment

0 Total Shares
Tweet
Share
Share
Pin
+1
Current Events Humor Leadership Staffing
ms12
Essential Hires for Multi-Site Churches

The folks at Causely.com explain that multi-site campuses are no longer just...

0886f716-be42-4d26-aab2-fc2e28a3dc5a.format_jpeg.inline_yes
Extremism Fight Extends to Facebook

Check out this story from this week’s edition of Ministry Briefing!...

prosandcons
Professionals Reinvent Themselves Every Four Years

Here is just one of the dozens of articles featured this...